Minutes of the Meeting of the Operating Guidelines Committee October 26, 2000
1. Meeting convened at 1:40 PM at the Corps of Engineers office.
In attendance: Sam Drake - USFWS Bill Grabill - USFWS Hope Moorer - GPA Chris Schuberth - AASU Bill Bailey - Corps Bill Farmer - Tybee Island Larry Keegan - Lockwood Greene (GPA) Morgan Rees - GPA Teri Leffek - Stevens Shipping
2. Mr. Rees announced his resignation as chair of the committee at the end of the meeting and nominated Ms. Leffek to be the new chair. There being no objection from the members present and the committee confirming that Ms. Leffek is willing to accept the assignment, the committee accepted Ms. Leffek as the new chair effective at the end of the meeting.
3. Following discussion of the change in chairmanship, the committee began discussion of updating the Matrix. Other members arrived early in this discussion.
Patty McIntosh
Ben Brewton
Results of discussion of the Matrix:
Trip Tollison arrived.
4. Discussion of peer review. Members had been previously provided a copy of the EPA Peer Review Handbook. Discussion centered on peer review concepts in the handbook and how they relate to the procedure employed by federal project studies. It was thought that most issues under consideration have a built-in peer review mechanism by virtue of the interagency coordination and public involvement required in developing a federal project and by the recommendations of the SEG. Since it was not certain that all issues would have such a complete review mechanism, the consensus was reached that additional peer review could be considered on a case-by-case basis.
The GPA team will review the study scopes and determine which are reporting data only and which are drawing conclusions. Further, they will look to see what degree of peer review exists in each. A summary report of the results will be provided to the committee.
5. Final report or work product of the SEG. One member raised an objection to discussing this subject because of an understanding that at the last SEG meeting, the SEG specifically chose not to refer the subject to the committee. Others wanted to discuss the subject. Much discussion ensued about whether the Operating Guidelines Committee should be considering this question. The following draft recommendation to the SEG was developed:
The OGC intends to discuss this at our next meeting unless the SEG directs otherwise. The OGC will make a recommendation in due course.
This is not recommended to the SEG at this time in accordance with the provisions of the Operating Guidelines as a result of one member not being able to live with the recommendation.
The meeting was turned over to the new chair, Ms. Leffek. It was agreed not to schedule any further meetings until the full SEG is informed of the discussion in item 5 above.
Respectfully submitted, Morgan Rees Chair Emeritus