Economic Working Group agreements on procedural and analytic
concepts to be applied and topics to be addressed or more fully addressed in the revised
economic analysis.
AGREEMENTS:
- EWG recommended and will implement a presentation by the Institute of
Water Resources to help the SEG and the public gain a better understanding of the maritime
industry.
- 1996 will not be used in any analysis as a base year.
- Benefits from lightloading are calculated by applying a percentage of
current lightloading patterns and extrapolating to projected port calls of vessels of
drafts which currently call the Port of Savannah.
- More scientific and engineering data are required to evaluate the
efficacy of proposed aeration systems to mitigate for lower dissolved oxygen.
- The deployment of larger ships might result in fewer port calls.
- The revised economics analysis will evaluate the consequences of
"second-order" impacts such as those created by adverse effects on commercial
and recreational fisheries and related resources important to nature-based tourism, as
such impacts affect both existing and projected income earned and business activity
supported by these resources.
- SEG members will have access to information, data, research etc. from
whomever revises and updates the economics analysis.
TOPICS WHICH SHOULD BE ADDRESSED OR MORE FULLY ADDRESSED IN
REVISED ECONOMIC ANALYSIS:
- The current deployment of 6,700 TEU vessels.
- The potential occurrence of mega-mega ships.
- Competition with Charleston once its Daniel Island Container Terminal is
finished in 2004.
- Freeport as a competing port.
- Competition with west coast ports
- An analysis of how trade lanes may change with more bigger ships.
- The effects of a continued trade imbalance especially since Savannah
assumes that growth will be export driven.
- Impacts of "fastships"
- Much more specific statements from customers especially in light of the
recent rash of shipping mergers.
- A trend towards transshipment.
- An industry trend away from general cargo.
- An evaluation, in a manner consistent with water resource planning
requirements, of infrastructure such as rail, road, land, and port landside infrastructure
needed to support expanded harbor activity.